Dorado Briones v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202423-2483California693 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO ARTURO DORADO No. 23-2483 BRIONES, Agency No.

A095-715-624

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 21, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BERZON, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges. Roberto Arturo Dorado Briones, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision affirming an Immigration

Judge (IJ) order denying his application for withholding of removal and protection

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We review the denial of withholding

of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.