Doe

Filed 8/23/24 Doe v. Indus Investments CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

JOHN DOE, B331252

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 23STCV04190) v.

INDUS INVESTMENTS, INC. et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Anne Richardson, Judge. Affirmed. Timothy D. McGonigle; Greenberg Traurig and Scott D. Bertzyk for Defendants and Appellants. Shirazi Law Firm and Emanuel S. Shirazi for Plaintiff and Respondent. Plaintiff John Doe was employed by defendants Indus Investments, Inc. (Indus), Tehmina Adaya (Adaya), and Royal Lush, LLC (Rush). Indus and Adaya initiated arbitration against plaintiff for alleged…