Sterling and Wilson Solar Solutions, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202423-35558California617 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STERLING AND WILSON SOLAR No. 23-35558 SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-03076-SAB Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF

MARYLAND, an Illinois insurance company; ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois insurance company,

Defendants-Appellees,

v.

CONTI LLC, Proposed Intervenor,

Movant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Stanley A. Bastian, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 19, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Proposed Intervenor-Appellant Conti LLC (“Conti”) appeals the district

court’s denial of its motion to intervene and stay in Plaintiff-Appellee Sterling and

Wilson Solar Solutions, Inc.’s (“Sterling”) suit against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.