Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202423-1708California1,173 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARGAT SINGH, No. 23-1708 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-587-125 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 16, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: TASHIMA, CALLAHAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent by Judge KOH.

Pargat Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order

by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of an order by

an immigration judge denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Because the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we deny the petition.

“We review the denial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.