Castillo-Lopez

Castillo-Lopez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 28, 202423-1074California854 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WALTER CASTILLO-LOPEZ, No. 23-1074

Petitioner, A206-889-379

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK GARLAND,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 20, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BRESS and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,*** District Judge. Concurrence by Judge VANDYKE.

Walter Castillo-Lopez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (the “Board”) order affirming the Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying Petitioner’s applications for asylum,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.