Schneider

United States v. Schneider

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202423-3899California397 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3899 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:10-cr-00361-JLT-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

TERRY LEE SCHNEIDER II,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Terry Lee Schneider II appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

his renewed motion to compel production of grand jury materials. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

While Schneider’s appeal from the district court’s order denying his first

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). motion to compel was pending, he renewed his motion in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.