Schneider
United States v. Schneider
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3899 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:10-cr-00361-JLT-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
TERRY LEE SCHNEIDER II,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 20, 2024**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
Terry Lee Schneider II appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying
his renewed motion to compel production of grand jury materials. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
While Schneider’s appeal from the district court’s order denying his first
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). motion to compel was pending, he renewed his motion in the…