Hornof

United States v. Hornof

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202423-2139California488 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2139 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:21-cr-00166-DCN-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JOSEPH HORNOF, AKA Joseph D. Hornof,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 19, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: CHRISTEN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge.***

Defendant Joseph Hornof appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion to suppress his confession on the ground that he received an inadequate

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. Miranda warning. Because the parties are familiar with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.