Ancheta

United States v. Ancheta

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202424-2027California324 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2027 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:12-cr-00015-HDM-CLB -1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

RANDY MACARIO ANCHETA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Randy Macario Ancheta appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ancheta argues that he presented extraordinary and compelling reasons for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). compassionate release, including that he is serving an unusually long…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.