Shane Betts v. Peter Swann

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202423-15434California2,306 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

AUG 27 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHANE BETTS, No. 23-15434

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01186-JJT v.

PETER SWANN, in his official capacity; et MEMORANDUM* al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 27, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Shane Betts appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

claims against Defendants-Appellees in his action relating to two car accidents.

Betts entered into written contractual agreements with a chiropractor (the Carrs)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and an attorney (Silence) for medical and legal services, respectively, provided

after the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.