Pierre

Pierre v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202424-1323California456 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO EDIOR PIERRE, No. 24-1323 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 5:23-cv-02606-ODW-JDE v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; M. BOWEN, Warden,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright, II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Edior Pierre appeals pro se from the district court’s order

summarily dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241, and the denial of his motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We review de novo a district court’s determination

that it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.