Katalin Bloodgood-Loper v. Lenard Loper

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202423-15109California617 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KATALIN BLOODGOOD-LOPER, No. 23-15109

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01320-JAD-BNW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LENARD LOPER; LVL INVESTMENTS,

LLC; MICHELLE L. MERCER,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Katalin Bloodgood-Loper appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action alleging various federal and state law claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir.

2010). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.