Katalin Bloodgood-Loper v. Lenard Loper
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202423-15109California617 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KATALIN BLOODGOOD-LOPER, No. 23-15109
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01320-JAD-BNW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LENARD LOPER; LVL INVESTMENTS,
LLC; MICHELLE L. MERCER,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 20, 2024**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
Katalin Bloodgood-Loper appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her action alleging various federal and state law claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir.
2010). We…