Gamal Soloman v. Alex Villanueva

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202422-56106California529 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GAMAL SOLOMAN, No. 22-56106

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-07722-JLS-KES

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ALEX VILLANUEVA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Gamal Soloman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action related to the court-ordered sale of Soloman’s former

residence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

Webb v. Trader Joe’s Co., 999 F.3d 1196, 1201 (9th Cir. 2021) (judgment on the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). pleadings under Fed. R. Civ. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.