Gamal Soloman v. Alex Villanueva
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202422-56106California529 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GAMAL SOLOMAN, No. 22-56106
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-07722-JLS-KES
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ALEX VILLANUEVA; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 20, 2024**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
Gamal Soloman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action related to the court-ordered sale of Soloman’s former
residence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.
Webb v. Trader Joe’s Co., 999 F.3d 1196, 1201 (9th Cir. 2021) (judgment on the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). pleadings under Fed. R. Civ. P.…