Christopher Miller v. M Soto
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202423-15597California340 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTOPHER J. MILLER, No. 23-15597
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-01117-AWI-SAB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
M SOTO, Sergeant in the Investigative Services Unit,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 20, 2024**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Christopher J. Miller appeals pro se from the
district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging
constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de
novo the district court’s ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment. Hamby v.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hammond,…