Christopher Miller v. M Soto

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202423-15597California340 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTOPHER J. MILLER, No. 23-15597

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-01117-AWI-SAB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

M SOTO, Sergeant in the Investigative Services Unit,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Christopher J. Miller appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo the district court’s ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment. Hamby v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hammond,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.