Rosenlund

Rosenlund v. Rosenlund CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 2024B331053California4,565 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zukin, J.

INTRODUCTION

Appellant Brian Rosenlund seeks to modify his child support obligation. After the dissolution of his marriage to Crystal Rosenlund,1 the court entered a judgment requiring Brian to pay child support. When he subsequently lost his job, Brian made multiple requests to modify the child support obligation. Brian appeals from the court’s April 20, 2023, order denying his second request to modify child support. The record is insufficient to establish the trial court abused its discretion in denying Brian’s second request for modification. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Our ability to discern the factual and procedural history of this case is hampered because of the sparse record on appeal, consisting only of Brian’s opening brief, a clerk’s transcript, and five additional documents Brian submitted to augment the record. The clerk’s transcript on appeal is meager, containing only six documents that pre-date Brian’s appeal. The record does not include reporter’s transcripts from the hearings on Brian’s second request for modification. Crystal has elected not to file a brief or appendix contesting Brian’s appeal. We therefore summarize the factual and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.