People v. Murphy CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 2024D083154California960 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/27/24 P. v. Murphy CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D083154

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. RIF1501653)

QUENTIN DAMON MURPHY,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Riverside County, John D. Molloy, Judge. Affirmed. Purported appeal from denial of a motion for relief under the California

Racial Justice Act (CRJA) (Pen. Code, § 745,1 subds. (b), (j)), which was filed before the petition for resentencing was filed, is dismissed. Quentin Damon Murphy, in pro. per.; and Joshua L. Siegel, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

All…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.