McBride

McBride v. Bergh CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 2024B323937California1,525 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 8/27/24 McBride v. Bergh CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

KATHLEEN WILLIAMS B323937

McBRIDE, Los Angeles County Defendant and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. (BC703537)

v.

KATHERINE BERGH,

Defendant and Respondent.

FELIX LOPEZ et al.,

Real parties in interest.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Judge. Affirmed. Century City Law Group and Robin Mashal for Appellant Hector Canino. Pettit Kohn Ingrassia Lutz & Dolin, Damian M. Dolin and Annie F. Fraser for Defendant and Respondent. No appearance for real parties in interest. ____________________ Identifying the actors in this unusual drama is the first step. Hector Canino is the appellant,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.