Everline Williams v. Redwood Toxicology Laboratory
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 202423-15251California609 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 29 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EVERLINE WILLIAMS, No. 23-15251
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-04501-HSG
v.
MEMORANDUM*
REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY
LABORATORY, DBA Abbott Laboratories,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 27, 2024**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Everline Williams appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in her employment action alleging federal and state law claims. Because
the facts are known to the parties, we repeat them only as necessary to explain our
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision.