Everline Williams v. Redwood Toxicology Laboratory

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 202423-15251California609 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EVERLINE WILLIAMS, No. 23-15251

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-04501-HSG

v.

MEMORANDUM*

REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY

LABORATORY, DBA Abbott Laboratories,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 27, 2024**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Everline Williams appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in her employment action alleging federal and state law claims. Because

the facts are known to the parties, we repeat them only as necessary to explain our

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision.

The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.