Thomas Ostly v. City and County of San Francisco
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 28, 202423-16000California1,659 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS OSTLY, No. 23-16000
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-08955-EMC
v.
MEMORANDUM *
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; CHESA BOUDIN,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted August 14, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: GRABER, CALLAHAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent and Partial Concurrence by Judge CALLAHAN.
Plaintiff Thomas Ostly worked in an at-will capacity as an Assistant District
Attorney for the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office from 2014 until his
termination in 2020. Plaintiff brought this action against Defendants, the City and
County of San Francisco and former District Attorney Chesa Boudin, alleging
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. claims of First Amendment retaliation; violation…