Tarverdiyeva
Tarverdiyeva v. Coinbase, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAHILA TARVERDIYEVA; VIJAY No. 24-826 TANDON, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05468-WHA Plaintiffs - Appellants,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
COINBASE, INC.; COINBASE GLOBAL,
INC.; PHILLIP MARTIN; MATTHEW
MULLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 20, 2024**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
Rahila Tarverdiyeva and Vijay Tandon appeal pro se from the district
court’s order denying their motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 60(b)(3) in their civil action alleging fraud and related claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.…