Steven Kneizys v. Fdic

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 28, 202423-35276California427 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN KNEIZYS, No. 23-35276

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01402-RSL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE

CORPORATION, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, Henderson, Nevada; ELIZABETH RICE; NORMAN R. MORRISON, Jr.; FRANKLIN H.

MORRISON; JAMES BOHANON; JAMES

MCLAUGHLIN; VICKI MCLAUGHLIN;

RONALD V. RICE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Steven Kneizys appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). in his action against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.