Peter Kleidman v. Audrey Collins

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PETER KLEIDMAN, No. 23-55128

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-03263-CJC-JDE

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AUDREY B. COLLINS, Justice; THOMAS

L. WILLHITE, Jr., Justice; BRIAN S.

CURREY, Justice,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Peter Kleidman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of state court proceedings. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of…