David Stebbins v. Karl Polano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 28, 202423-15531California1,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS, DBA No. 23-15531 Acerthorn, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-04184-JSW Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

KARL POLANO, DBA Sofiannp; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

David Anthony Stebbins appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing his action alleging copyright infringement and related claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

dismissal for failure to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.