People v. Allen CA3
Opinion
Opinion
DISCUSSION
Appointed counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and asking this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we have noted the oral pronouncement of judgment does not include that the codefendants are jointly and severally liable for the direct victim restitution. Because that is now accurately reflected in the minute order and the trial court has ordered the abstract of judgment amended, we need only modify the judgment to reflect the imposition of joint and several liability. We find no other arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is modified to reflect that the codefendants are all jointly and severally liable for the direct victim restitution. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.
/s/ ROBIE, Acting P. J.