Tate

Tate v. Central Unified School District CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 28, 2024F086429California4,987 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/28/24 Tate v. Central Unified School District CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

KIMBERLY TATE,

F086429

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 19CECG03497) v.

CENTRAL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, OPINION Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Jr., Judge. Law Office of Kevin G. Little and Kevin G. Little for Plaintiff and Appellant. Law Office of Paul Auchard and Paul Auchard for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- Appellant Kimberly Tate appeals after the trial court ruled that her California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) claim could not proceed under a mental health disability discrimination theory because appellant failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.