Peter Szanto v. Evye Szanto

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 202422-35849California389 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PETER SZANTO, No. 22-35849

Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-533-SI

v.

EVYE SZANTO, et al., MEMORANDUM*

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 27, 2024**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Peter Szanto appeals pro se from the District Court’s order affirming the

Bankruptcy Court’s award of attorney’s fees as a sanction against Szanto in an

Adversary Proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review

de novo the District Court’s decision on appeal from the Bankruptcy Court without

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deference to the District Court. In re…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.