Peter Szanto v. Evye Szanto
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 202422-35849California389 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 29 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PETER SZANTO, No. 22-35849
Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-533-SI
v.
EVYE SZANTO, et al., MEMORANDUM*
Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 27, 2024**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Peter Szanto appeals pro se from the District Court’s order affirming the
Bankruptcy Court’s award of attorney’s fees as a sanction against Szanto in an
Adversary Proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review
de novo the District Court’s decision on appeal from the Bankruptcy Court without
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deference to the District Court. In re…