Ajeenah Crittendon v. Angelica Muldrow

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 202423-16205California1,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AJEENAH CRITTENDON; EZ E-FILE No. 23-16205 TAX PREPARERS, INC., a California corporation, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-09153-RS

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

ANGELICA MULDROW, AKA Angelica Ivana,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 20, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: BRESS and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,** District Judge.

EZ E-File Tax Preparers, Inc. (EZ), and its CEO, Ajeenah Crittendon

(collectively, “Crittendon”), appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claims

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. against Crittendon’s niece, Angelica Muldrow, for defamation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.