Yue

Yue v. Trigmax Solutions CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2024A167577California3,979 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/29/24 Yue v. Trigmax Solutions CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

DONGXIAO YUE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A167577 v. TRIGMAX SOLUTIONS, LLC, et al., (Contra Costa County Defendants and Respondents. Super. Ct. No. MSC1601118)

Dongxiao Yue appeals from an order dismissing defendants Trigmax Solutions, LLC (Trigmax), Muye Liu (Liu), and Yeyeclub.com for failure to bring the action to trial within the mandatory five-year period. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.310.)1 The question presented is whether an oral stipulation to continue the trial date made in open court and entered into the minutes of the court is an agreement to extend the five-year deadline when the stipulated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.