Mendones

Mendones v. Sate of Cal. CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2024A170046California3,894 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 8/29/24 Mendones v. Sate of Cal. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

MARIDOL MENDONES,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A170046

v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. Defendants and

CPF-23-517961)

Respondents.

In this latest action, Maridol Mendones appeals from the dismissal of her first amended complaint (FAC) alleging the Honorable Tani G. Cantil- Sakauye, Chief Justice of California (Ret.), Jorge Navarrete, Clerk/Executive Officer of the Supreme Court of California, and Florentino Jimenez, Assistant Deputy Clerk of the Supreme Court of California (collectively, Judicial Respondents) improperly denied a fee waiver application. Mendones also challenges the denial of her motion to vacate the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.