Reynolds

Reynolds v. AHM Resicom CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2024B323202California3,210 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/29/24 Reynolds v. AHM Resicom CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

RASHYN REYNOLDS, B323202

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No.19STCV13678) v.

AHM RESICOM LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Shirley K. Watkins, Judge. Affirmed. Rashyn R. Reynolds, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Phillips, Spallas & Angstadt, Matthew A. Gardner, Kristin A. Messih for Defendant and Respondent. Appellant Rashyn Reynolds appeals from the judgment entered against her following the bench trial of her general negligence claim against her former landlord, respondent AHM Resicom, LLC (AHM). Reynolds, who is proceeding in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.