People v. Badue CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2024A170139California311 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/29/24 P. v. Badue CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A170139

v. STEVE BADUE, (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. 23-SF-020606-A) Defendant and Appellant.

Steve Badue appeals from the trial court’s order finding he violated the terms of his parole. The trial court reinstated his parole, and ordered him to serve 180 days in jail, while granting him a total of 153 days of credit. His court-appointed counsel filed a brief raising no issues and seeking our independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). The brief includes counsel’s declaration stating that he informed defendant of his intent to file a Wende brief, that he provided…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.