Delis

Delis v. Thorn CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2024F086944California5,693 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/29/24 Delis v. Thorn CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

MARIO DELIS et al.,

F086944

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-21-102152) v.

JEFFREY D. THORN et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kern County. Thomas S. Clark, Judge. Rushing McCarl, Ryan McCarl, John Rushing and Davit Avagyan, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Lynch and Lynch, Craig M. Lynch; Heller & Edwards, Lawrence E. Heller, for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- Plaintiff and appellant Mario Delis filed a motion to compel discovery against a third-party deponent, Sandra Henson, who is an employee of defendant and respondent Jeffrey Thorn and represented by Thorn’s attorneys. The trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.