City of Claremont v. Sandblossom CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2024B334218California3,457 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/29/24 City of Claremont v. Sandblossom CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

CITY OF CLAREMONT, B334218

Plaintiff, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19PSCP00027) v.

SANDBLOSSOM, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent;

CALIFORNIA RECEIVERSHIP

GROUP,

Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Peter Hernandez, Judge. Affirmed. California Receivership Group, Mark S. Adams and Thomas A. Yatteau for Appellant. Stoner Carlson and Richard A. McDonald for Defendant and Respondent. Sandblossom LLC owns certain residential property (the property) in Claremont that had fallen into disrepair. The City of Claremont declared the property a public nuisance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.