Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. v. City of Phoenix
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 30 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A., No. 23-15938
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-04447-DAE-BGM v.
CITY OF PHOENIX, a political subdivision MEMORANDUM* of the State of Arizona; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted August 12, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: GRABER, CALLAHAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. (“G&K”), a law firm, seeks to recover $21.
million in costs that it allegedly incurred in responding to the City of Phoenix,
Maricopa County, and Prudential Overall Supply’s (collectively “City”) release of
hazardous substances that contaminated the Roosevelt Irrigation District’s (“RID”)
groundwater wells. G&K filed the current cost recovery action under the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.…