Daniel Howard v. Tanium, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 30 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL HOWARD, No. 23-15451
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-09703-JSC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TANIUM, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jacqueline Scott Corley, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 10, 2024 Submission Withdrawn April 11, 2024 Resubmitted August 28, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Daniel Howard sued Defendant Tanium, Inc., for fraudulent
misrepresentation. Plaintiff alleged that Defendant misrepresented the fair market
value (“FMV”) of the restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that were included in the
compensation package that Defendant offered to induce him to go to work for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Defendant. Plaintiff timely appeals the summary judgment entered in…