Amie Drammeh v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 202422-36038California3,276 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMIE DRAMMEH; et al., No. 22-36038

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00202-BJR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 26, 2024 Submission Withdrawn June 24, 2024 Resubmitted August 30, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BUMATAY

Cherno Ceesay (“Ceesay”), an Uber driver, was murdered by two Uber

riders in a failed carjacking attempt in December 2020. His estate, Amie

Drammeh et al. (“Drammeh”), sued Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”), for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. negligence and wrongful death. Drammeh now appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.