Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 202423-3639California985 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARMANDEEP SINGH, No. 23-3639 Agency No. Petitioner, A215-678-786 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 21, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BERZON, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Harmandeep Singh petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA) decision affirming an immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

Torture (CAT). We deny the petition.

We review factual findings on “the record ‘as a whole’” “for substantial

evidence, meaning that the determination must be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.