Singh
Singh v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 202423-3639California985 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 30 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HARMANDEEP SINGH, No. 23-3639 Agency No. Petitioner, A215-678-786 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 21, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: BERZON, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Harmandeep Singh petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals
(BIA) decision affirming an immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against
Torture (CAT). We deny the petition.
We review factual findings on “the record ‘as a whole’” “for substantial
evidence, meaning that the determination must be…