Leocadio Figueroa v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 202418-56131California567 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEOCADIO FIGUEROA, No. 18-56131

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:11-cv-06228-DMG-FFM v.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 30, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: CALLAHAN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,*** District Judge.

Mr. Figueroa appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment for

defendant Sergeant Gonzalez. He alleges that despite our prior determination that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.