Fraiser

I. INTRODUCTION

Sharee Fraiser and Daniel Thomas share one five-year-old child, S.T. S.T. was born in California but currently lives with Thomas in Georgia. Throughout much of 2022, Frasier unsuccessfully attempted to bring a Request for Order and contempt charges against Thomas. The trial court summarized that history in its December 23, 2022 written ruling, denying an ex parte request brought by Frasier. In February 2023, Fraiser filed a motion seeking sole legal and physical custody of S.T. to live with her in California. The court denied the request, instead awarding Thomas sole legal and physical custody. Fraiser appeals this order making two arguments:

First, the court erred in how it applied the LaMusga1 factors when ruling on her motion. Second, the trial judge exhibited bias against Frasier. Fraiser asserts these errors violated her due process rights by depriving her of a fair custody hearing. Thomas did not respond to this appeal. We conclude Fraiser forfeited these arguments because her brief fails to comply with appellate procedural rules governing citations to both law and the trial court’s record. Therefore, it is not possible to discern how Fraiser arrives at her…