Simon

Simon v. Rosenthal CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2024A168225California6,601 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 8/30/24 Simon v. Rosenthal CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

LORAN SIMON,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A168225

v. DEBORAH ROSENTHAL, (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CCH-23-585472) Defendant and Respondent.

Loran Simon appeals from a judgment denying his request for a civil harassment restraining order (CHRO). He contends the trial was marred by numerous due process violations, including both procedural issues and alleged bias by the presiding judge. Simon also asserts the trial court erred in awarding post-judgment costs and denying his motion for new trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

1 On April 8, 2024, Simon filed a motion to augment the record or, in

the alternative, request judicial notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.