Simon

Simon v. Brabec CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2024A168223California6,525 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 8/30/24 Simon v. Brabec CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

LORAN SIMON,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A168223

v. TODD BRABEC, (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CCH-22-584550) Defendant and Respondent.

LORAN SIMON,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A168226

v. WHITNEY GOLDSEN, (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CCH-22-584652) Defendant and Respondent.

Loran Simon appeals from two judgments denying his requests for civil harassment restraining orders (CHRO) against defendants Todd Brabec and Whitney Goldsen.1 He contends the trials were marred by numerous due process violations, including both procedural issues and alleged bias by the presiding judge.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.