Doe I v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DOE I; DOE II; IVY HE; DOE III; No. 15-16909
DOE IV; DOE V; DOE VI;
CHARLES LEE; ROE VII; ROE VIII; D.C. No. 5:11-cv-
LIU GUIFU; DOE IX; WEIYU 02449-EJD
WANG, and those individuals similarly situated,
ORDER
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.; JOHN
CHAMBERS; FREDY CHEUNG,
AKA Zhang Sihua; DOES, 1-100,
Defendants-Appellees.
Filed September 3, 2024
Before: A. Wallace Tashima, Marsha S. Berzon, and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges.
Order; Statement by Judge Berzon; Dissent by Judge Bumatay DOE I V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
SUMMARY *
Alien Tort Statute
The panel denied a petition for panel rehearing and a petition for rehearing en banc in a case in which the panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s judgment dismissing claims under the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”) and the Torture Victim Protection Act, and remanded. The action was brought by practitioners of Falun Gong who alleged that they or family members were victims of human rights abuses by the Chinese Communist Party and Chinese government officials and that these…