Carlos Soto-Carrasco v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 202420-72696California677 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS SOTO-CARRASCO, No. 20-72696

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-087-844

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 3, 2024**

Before: BYBEE and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,*** District Judge.

Carlos Soto-Carrasco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to

reopen his application for cancellation of removal. As the parties are familiar with

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. the facts, we do not recount them…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.