Carlos Soto-Carrasco v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 202420-72696California677 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 3 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLOS SOTO-CARRASCO, No. 20-72696
Petitioner, Agency No. A206-087-844
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 3, 2024**
Before: BYBEE and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,*** District Judge.
Carlos Soto-Carrasco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to
reopen his application for cancellation of removal. As the parties are familiar with
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. the facts, we do not recount them…