People v. Roberson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 2024C099484California192 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feinberg, J.

BACKGROUND

In 2022, a police officer observed a plastic bag in Roberson’s vehicle during a traffic stop. Roberson admitted that the bag contained methamphetamine. The People charged him with possession of a controlled substance after a specified prior conviction (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)) and alleged a prior strike. Roberson pleaded no

1 contest to possession of a controlled substance. After considering aggravating and mitigating circumstances, the trial court sentenced him to the upper term of three years. Roberson timely appealed.

DISCUSSION

Appointed counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts and procedural history of the case and asks this court to review the record. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 436.) Counsel advised Roberson of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the date the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days have elapsed, and Roberson has not filed a supplemental brief. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record pursuant to Wende, we find no arguable errors that would result in a disposition more favorable to Roberson. We therefore affirm the judgment.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.