United States v. Joshua Flores
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 202422-10256California1,175 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10256
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:20-xr-90052-MMC-1 v.
JOSHUA FLORES, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 8, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: R. NELSON, FORREST, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Joshua Flores appeals his convictions for interfering with agency
actions, disorderly conduct, and intoxication to a dangerous degree in a public park.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, albeit on different grounds.
1. Right to Confrontation. Flores argues that the district court violated his
Sixth Amendment right to confrontation by admitting at trial testimony given by
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Park Ranger…