Mya Hendrix v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 202422-55732California1,518 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MYA HENDRIX, an individual, No. 22-55732

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00045-TWR-NLS v.

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a public entity; et MEMORANDUM* al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Todd W. Robinson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 13, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: EBEL,** BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Mya Hendrix (Mya) appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint for

failure to state a claim and for noncompliance with a court order. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part, reverse in part, and

remand for further proceedings.

We review de novo a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.