Fitzhugh

United States v. Fitzhugh

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 202423-365California812 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-365 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:20-cr-03596-WQH-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JEFFREY LEE FITZHUGH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 12, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: EBEL***, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Jeffery Fitzhugh was convicted of importing 50 grams or more of

a substance containing methamphetamine after he entered the San Ysidro Port of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Senior Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, sitting by designation. Entry in San Diego, California in a vehicle containing 45.7…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.