United Behavioral Health v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Sa

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

SEP 4 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, No. 24-242 Petitioner-Defendant, v. D.C. Nos. 3:14-cv-02346-JCS, 3:14-cv-5337

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent,

DAVID WIT and GARY ALEXANDER, et al., Real-Parties-In-Interest-Plaintiffs.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Submitted September 4, 2024**

Before: CHRISTEN and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and ANELLO,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael M. Anello, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. 1 Defendant United Behavioral Health (UBH) petitions for a writ of mandamus,

contending that the district court misunderstood…