Usdol
Michael Neely v. Usdol
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 202422-70100California557 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL NEELY, No. 22-70100
Petitioner, LABR No. 2018-AIR-00019 ARB Case No. 2020-0071 v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent,
THE BOEING COMPANY,
Intervenor.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Labor
Submitted September 3, 2024**
Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Michael Neely petitions pro se for review of the Department of Labor's
Administrative Review Board's (“ARB”) decision and order dismissing his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). complaint under the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the
21st Century (“AIR21”). We have jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. § 42121(b)(4)(A).