Usdol

Michael Neely v. Usdol

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 202422-70100California557 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL NEELY, No. 22-70100

Petitioner, LABR No. 2018-AIR-00019 ARB Case No. 2020-0071 v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent,

THE BOEING COMPANY,

Intervenor.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Labor

Submitted September 3, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Michael Neely petitions pro se for review of the Department of Labor's

Administrative Review Board's (“ARB”) decision and order dismissing his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). complaint under the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the

21st Century (“AIR21”). We have jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. § 42121(b)(4)(A).

We review the ARB’s decisions in accordance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.