Derrick Sanderlin v. Jason Dwyer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 202423-15487California1,098 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DERRICK SANDERLIN; et al., No. 23-15487

Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-04824-BLF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JASON DWYER; et al.,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

CITY OF SAN JOSE; et al.,

Defendants,

v.

NAACP OF SAN JOSE/ SILICON

VALLEY,

Third-party-plaintiff.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 7, 2024 San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellees Derrick Sanderlin, Breanna Contreras, Pietro di Donato,

Adira Sharkey, and Vera Clanton (Plaintiffs)1 are individuals who attended protests

that took place in San Jose following the death of George Floyd in 2020.

Defendant-Appellants Jason Dwyer, Lee Tassio, Jonathan Marshall, and Juan

Avila (Defendants) are police…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.