People v. Smart CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 2024C100248California1,061 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/4/24 P. v. Smart CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100248

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 22FE021151)

v.

MICHAEL JAMAAL SMART,

Defendant and Appellant.

After the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence, defendant Michael Jamaal Smart pled no contest to possessing a firearm having been convicted of a felony. Following sentencing, defendant appealed from the denial of his suppression motion. Defendant’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 asking this court to independently review the record to determine if there are any arguable errors that would result in a disposition more favorable to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.